Mostrando postagens com marcador Big Techs. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador Big Techs. Mostrar todas as postagens

terça-feira, 22 de setembro de 2026

AOC manda a real!

 

Meidas Touch 19-09-2026
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1444951707826428&set=a.146905417631070 
Full statement:

Last weekend, Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, one of the largest AI companies in the world, publicly asked his industry to slow down AI development.

Shortly after, Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, followed suit. Then Elon Musk.

This all came days after an Anthropic researcher quit, citing his belief that this technology could wipe out humanity and that AI companies are “gambling with our lives.”

For years, people have warned that generative AI could slip out of our direct control.

Those safety concerns must be taken seriously.

And this is why I have advocated for strict safety standards on how AI is built and deployed, public oversight over this technology, and using existing laws to hold these companies accountable when they cause harm.

But I want to draw your attention to another reality: Right now, the U.S. economy and our financial futures are riding on Silicon Valley’s bet that AI will soon be immensely profitable and pay off. And that bet isn’t looking good.

The formula for a profitable business isn’t complicated: make more money than you spend. But the biggest AI companies aren’t doing that. They are spending hundreds of billions per year on data centers, chips, and other costs while their ability to make revenues that exceed their already-immense sunk costs are unclear. Experts estimate that these AI companies will require another $600 billion of debt just to finance themselves in 2026 alone. That is more than the entire budgets of the U.S. Departments of Justice, Transportation, and Education combined.

Meanwhile, despite almost every single one of these companies not turning a profit and having sunk billions of investor dollars in development of data centers and other infrastructure, AI companies are also on a spending spree of hundreds of millions of dollars in lobbying and dark money in our elections.

It would be one thing if we were discussing a few private companies with a poor business model. But last year, virtually all stock market gains - 80% - rested entirely on just a handful of AI companies.

That tells us two things:

1. Nearly the entire U.S. economy outside the AI industry is relatively stagnating and faring poorly and the gains from these few companies are disguising it; and
2. Millions of people’s retirements - including their pensions, 401ks, and investments - are potentially exposed to this risk.

That’s why these AI companies’ dubious financial positions matter to working people.

These companies argue that debt is necessary. They’ll tell you that building transformative technologies requires upfront capital, and that massive borrowing today will pay off in generating unprecedented prosperity tomorrow.

But this is not the typical debt that startups take on while they build out a company. We are talking about billions going on trillions of dollars leveraged with no indication that these companies will be able to recoup these funds profitably. And they are increasingly looking to the government as their source of cash.

In an effort to hide their debt, tech companies have been relying on “circular financing” where tech giants like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft give billions to AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic, only for those startups to hand that money right back to buy AI processing power.

In other words, these AI companies are luring in new investors by making it look like their financials are healthier than they really are.

What’s even worse is that retirement and pension funds are key to supporting this illusion.

When the AI companies issue bonds to raise more money, your pension funds and retirement accounts are some of the biggest buyers. When Musk’s AI business went public, it became part of index funds where millions of Americans invest our savings. Many Americans don’t even know that their retirement investments are tied up in these companies at all.

From Big Tech’s perspective, that’s a feature, not a bug. By tying our futures to their reckless gambling, AI billionaires are trying to make themselves too big to fail. They think they can take such dangerous risks because we will bail them out if things go wrong.

Sound familiar? This scene is dangerously reminiscent of the rampant speculation, corruption, and broken incentives leading up to the 2008 financial crisis that plunged millions of working class Americans into financial chaos that we never fully recovered from.

It is no accident that these warnings from Altman and Amodei come months - if not weeks - before these companies were meant to go public.

When companies go public, they have to be more transparent about how they are doing financially. And after a waiting period, they typically have to let private investors - like their own employees - sell their shares.

The New York Times recently confirmed that OpenAI has postponed going public for this very reason. They are in no rush for the truth about their finances to come out.

But the moment these oligarchs began to seek our public tax dollars and public contracts while exposing their companies to public pension funds and investments, they opened themselves to public accountability and scrutiny.

Silicon Valley billionaires have rigged the game and are attempting to shift their financial risk to working people: If they’re right about AI’s potential, they reap the profits. If they’re wrong and the bubble bursts, they are setting up the American people to pick up the tab.

Heads, they win; tails, we lose.

We can stop this, and we shouldn’t play their game. Together we can address both the economic and safety threats of unrestricted AI development and prevent financial chaos and stabilize market risk.

We must make it clear now that should the AI bubble pop, Congress should not bail out Big Tech.

And across our federal agencies, we have the authorities and tools to hold AI companies and their leaders accountable for releasing dangerous, unvetted, and defective products. We must not wait.

Silicon Valley billionaires want us to believe that AI robots will destroy humanity.

But the biggest threat to humanity are the tech oligarchs themselves.

It’s time we hold them accountable.

Thank you for reading.

In solidarity,

Alexandria


domingo, 8 de fevereiro de 2026

Anais do capitalismo mais-que-tardio

Vamos combinar: já não se trata de 'desigualdade'. Essa gente não é 'rica'. O que estamos testemunhando é a pura e simples ascensão, por força das leis da economia de mercado e de seu arcabouço jurídico - o direito de propriedade como 'cláusula pétrea' das constituições democráticas dos modernos Estados nacionais - de um grupúsculo de capitalistas concentrados em uma dúzia de países à condição de 'enclosurers' das forças produtivas que a humanidade vem criando e desenvolvendo, sob diferentes formas históricas, desde tempos imemoriais. O capitalismo não acabou, como quer Varoufakis, pela simples razão de que o trabalho assalariado segue sendo a fonte de todo valor, e seus produtos e serviços o lastro de todo título de valor, mas é hoje, de fato, regido por um pequeno consorcio internacional de barões da tecnologia, energia, comunicações, entretenimento, imóveis, automóveis, medicina, armamentos, serviços públicos etc., além, é claro, da prolífica, tão prolífica que parece ter vida própria, indústria planetária de títulos de direito econômico sobre tudo isso, que chamamos de finança! 

A 'função social da propriedade', tão cara ao urbanismo progressista, é uma reivindicação necessária, diria mesmo indispensável no mais amplo sentido, precisamente porque essas 12 pessoas "que concentram mais riqueza que metade da humanidade" têm em mãos, com base na dinâmica imparável da acumulação de sua riqueza e poder, o destino da civilização - cidades obviamente incluídas.

2026-02-08

quinta-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2026

Anais do capitalismo mais-que-tardio

The Guardian 28-01-2026, por Joanna Partridge
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/28/amazon-global-job-cuts-email-error-workers-sent

Amazon tells workers it will cut 16,000 jobs worldwide in second big wave of layoffs

(..) It is the second big wave of job cuts at the US online retail company, and comes just three months after the company said it was slashing 14,000 roles. Amazon employs about 1.5 million workers worldwide. (,,) 
The company said the “additional organisational changes” were designed to “strengthen our organisation by reducing layers, increasing ownership, and removing bureaucracy”, according to a blogpost to staff from Beth Galetti, the senior vice-president of people experience and technology. (..)


Perguntado pela reportagem de Avebarna Herald sobre o futuro do emprego e as perspectivas dos assalariados na era da IA, o patrão de um milhão e meio de trabalhadores espalhados pelo mundo - se formassem um sindicato seria quase uma nova Internacional - declarou: "Not my problem".

2026-01-29 

terça-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2026

A indústria do século XXI: alienação digital

Geddry 27-01-2026, por Shanley Hurt
https://marygeddry.com/p/the-algorithmic-conveyor-belt-of

The Algorithmic Conveyor Belt of Nightmare Fuel

"(..) And the mess, to be clear, is not subtle. The AP reports Grok’s image tools were used to “undress” people and produce sexualized depictions, triggering bans or warnings in some countries and a “global backlash.” The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) says that after a one-click image-editing feature took off, Grok generated an estimated 3 million sexualized images over an 11-day window, including an estimated 23,000 that appeared to depict children, based on sampling and extrapolation from posts. It’s the kind of statistic that makes you want to throw your phone into the ocean, then apologize to the ocean. (..)

2026-01-27

domingo, 25 de janeiro de 2026

Me imprensa que eu gosto

The Washington Post 25-01-2026, por Editorial Board
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/25/minneapolis-immigration-killing-government-shutdown-ice-alex-pretti/

UNJUST????? Deixa ver se entendi. Alex Pretti é este da foto e foi morto com uma borrifada de spray de ketchup...

2026-01-25


domingo, 28 de dezembro de 2025

A indústria do século XXI: alienação digital

The Guardian 27-12-2025, por Aisha Down
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/dec/27/more-than-20-of-videos-shown-to-new-youtube-users-are-ai-slop-study-finds

More than 20% of the videos that YouTube’s algorithm shows to new users are “AI slop” – low-quality AI-generated content designed to farm views, research has found. The video-editing company Kapwing surveyed 15,000 of the world’s most popular YouTube channels – the top 100 in every country – and found that 278 of them contain only AI slop.


Together, these AI slop channels have amassed more than 63bn views and 221 million subscribers, generating about $117m (£90m) in revenue each year, according to estimates. The researchers also made a new YouTube account and found that 104 of the first 500 videos recommended to its feed were AI slop. One-third of the 500 videos were “brainrot”, a category that includes AI slop and other low-quality content made to monetise attention. (..)

2025-12-28

domingo, 21 de dezembro de 2025

Anais do capitalismo mais-que-tardio

Bloomberg Línea 19-12-2025, por Ben Stupples e Devon Pendleton
https://www.bloomberglinea.com.br/2025/11/19/familias-bilionarias-investem-mais-no-setor-de-defesa-com-risco-geopolitico-em-alta/

Com conflitos militares se intensificando em várias frentes e erosão da ordem mundial tradicional liderada pelos Estados Unidos, o setor de defesa se tornou um dos grandes negócios do ano.


O índice S&P 500 Aerospace & Defense, que inclui empresas do segmento listadas na bolsa americana, subiu 34% no ano, enquanto o índice equivalente europeu disparou 75%. No segundo trimestre de 2025, mais de US$ 19 bilhões em venture capital foram destinados a startups ligadas à defesa, segundo dados da Pitchbook — um salto de 200% em relação ao ano anterior.

Family offices têm sido uma fonte essencial desse capital, já que costumam ter liberdade de ação maior, tolerância ao risco e, com frequência, um viés nacionalista. Pelo menos um quinto dos 500 indivíduos mais ricos do mundo hoje têm um family office, encarregado de preservar fortunas que somam mais de US$ 4 trilhões, segundo o Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

Entre eles está Peter Thiel, cujo family office adquiriu uma participação na startup alemã de drones de defesa Stark neste ano, em uma rodada liderada pela gigante do Vale do Silício Sequoia Capital. (..)

2025-12-21

sábado, 22 de novembro de 2025

domingo, 9 de novembro de 2025

A indústria do século XXI - alienação digital

CNBC 06-11-2025, por Jonathan Vanian
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/06/meta-reportedly-projected-10percent-of-2024-sales-came-from-scam-fraud-ads.html

Meta projected that 10% of its overall sales in 2024, or about $16 billion, came from running online ads for scams and banned goods, according to a Thursday report from Reuters.

Those kinds of ads included promotions for “fraudulent e-commerce and investment schemes, illegal online casinos and the sale of banned medical products,” according to the Reuters report, which was based on internal company documents. Those documents showed the company’s attempts to measure the prevalence of fraudulent advertising on its apps like Facebook and Instagram.

Meta brought in more than $164.5 billion in overall sales for 2024. Last week, the company said that third-quarter sales rose 26% year-over-year to $51.24 billion and that it lifted the low end of its total expenses for the year by $2 billion as part of its massive investments into artificial intelligence.

The Reuters report cited a December 2024 document that showed how Meta each year generates roughly $7 billion in annualized sales from so-called “higher risk” scam ads, which are promotions that are clearly deceptive. Each day, Meta shows users an estimated 15 billion of these higher risk scam ads, the Reuters report said, citing a separate document.

Although some of the documents show that Meta aims to reduce the amount of bogus ads on its platform, the Reuters report also said that other documents suggest the company is concerned that its business projections could be impacted by any abrupt removal of the fraudulent promotions. (..)

2025-11-09

domingo, 2 de novembro de 2025

A indústria do século XXI: alienação digital

NYTimes 28-10-2025, por Joon Lee
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/28/opinion/sports-gambling-major-leagues.html
 

“(..) Allegations of athletes’ betting on games in their own leagues are multiplying. Six in 10 Americans now express skepticism about the integrity of sport, wondering whether players, referees and coaches are throwing games.

All the while, gambling addiction is quietly growing, leaving a trail of financial ruin, debt and shame.

Thirty-seven percent of American adults — and 60 percent of avid fans — say they have placed a bet on sports. Nearly half of men ages 18 to 49 report having an online sports betting account.

We see gambling everywhere now — in our soaring stock market, the booms and busts of Bitcoin, the rise of techno-oligarchs like Elon Musk. The democratic process itself can now effectively be wagered on. (..)


2025-11-02

domingo, 12 de outubro de 2025

Anais do capitalismo mais-que-tardio

BBC News Brasil 10-10-2025
https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/c5ye12q20wvo

Montagem: Avebarna
Gente, se os donos do mundo estão se preparando para o fim do mundo, não seria o caso de destituí-los de suas funções por confessa incapacidade de governar a potência histórica de que são herdeiros e beneficiários - o capital? 

Se a hora da 'função social da propriedade' não é esta, babau!

2025-10-12

Para uma eloquente análise das decisões de investimento inexoravelmente temerárias e antissociais das Big Techs & Parceiros, leia em Substack o artigo deste domingo do insuspeito Paul Krugman, "Technology Bubbles: Causes and Consequences - What history can teach us about AI frenzy”.
https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/technology-bubbles-causes-and-consequences

quinta-feira, 29 de agosto de 2024

Crime digital, justiça digital!

UOL 29-08-2024
https://noticias.uol.com.br/colunas/carolina-brigido/2024/08/29/moraes-consultou-colegas-antes-de-intimar-musk-e-tem-apoio-para-suspender-x.htm

O ministro Alexandre de Moraes, do STF (Supremo Tribunal Federal), conversou com ao menos dois colegas da corte antes de tomar a decisão de notificar o bilionário Elon Musk por meio do X. Esses ministros consideram correta a intimação. Um deles, ouvido em caráter reservado pela coluna, lembrou que nenhuma empresa pode funcionar no Brasil sem representação legal e em desrespeito às leis e à soberania nacional.

Montagem: Avebarna

O estranho nessa história é ser preciso que um ministro do STF, ou o próprio STF, tome tal providência porque o Estado brasileiro ainda não se deu conta de que o X, como o Uber, o Facebook, o Instagram e tantos outros são empresas que faturam montanhas de dinheiro com negócios no Brasil, manifesta ou disfarçadamente ilegais em alguns casos, como é o da prática e difusão em massa de crimes de injúria, calúnia, difamação, charlatanismo, racismo, misoginia, nazifascismo, corrupção de menores etc., sem falar de evasão fiscal, superexploração do trabalho e outros tipos. 

Ou será que os Estados nacionais já deixaram de existir e ninguém percebeu?

Aos fanáticos do vale tudo da liberdade de expressão apoiado na presunção da inocência, eu responderia que se a sociedade criou a produção de crimes em massa em tempo real, pois que invente também uma justiça em massa em tempo real; digamos, para começar, uma  'justiça digital' 100% financiada com os lucros do próprio negócio!

2024-08-29